Archive - Aug 2007
Motion Denied
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Fri, 08/31/2007 - 19:47
This afternoon, Judge Kravitz heard the final testimony regarding a preliminary injunction in the Avery Doninger case. He stressed the preliminary aspects of this and that he was only ruling on the constitutional aspects. Testimony ended around 5 PM and his thirty four page opinion was available on the courts website about forty five minutes later. He has denied the Doninger's request for relief.
In the opening paragraph, he states that 'Just about everyone but Avery agrees that the manner in which Avery expressed her frustration was offensive and inappropriate.'
Everyone is very broad and I do not fall within his bounds of 'just about everyone'. He recognizes that what Avery wrote was on a personal blog, but fails to consider that context in his ruling.
He states 'it contained at best misleading and at worse false information regarding the music festival'. In this, he accepts the testimony of the principal despite its contradictions. My understanding from Avery's testimony is that her blog post contained information that she considered accurate.
The crux of Judge Kravitz' decision is that if a student, at home, writes on a blog using words that some members of the school administration consider offensive, inappropriate, or inaccurate, the school is within its bounds to punish the student. This overly broad ruling is damaging to democracy.
Our forefathers who recognized that civil discourse, even when it uses less than civil words, is a cornerstone of our democracy must be rolling in our graves.
During his final comments, he noted that this case is one that is likely to find its way to the Supreme Court. He has just moved it one step closer and an appeal appears likely.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
Rate on NewsTrustAugust 30th
An exploration into Second Life Trading
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 08/30/2007 - 20:51
Over the past month, when I’ve had free moments here and there, I’ve been exploring virtual stock trading in Second Life. This article will provide a brief history of virtual trading in Second Life, a review of various virtual stock exchanges, and ideas for future trading development.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
Knowing the facts
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 08/30/2007 - 12:15
Today, I received a comment on my blog post Democracy is Scary entitled, know the facts that I think deserves addressing in a full post.
The commentator asserts that I am not “accurately representing the facts”. The first assertion of the commenter is that “the taxpayers are not paying for the administrators representation”. This is based on an apparent misunderstanding concerning who is paying directly for the lead attorney. The lead attorney, Thomas Gerarde as well as Katherine Rule, both of Howd & Ludorf, are being paid by the insurance company, Massamont Insurance. This does not mean that the taxpayers are off the hook. My understanding is that there is a deductible and may be limits to the amounts that are covered as part of the insurance policy. In addition, there is no way of knowing if this case will cause in increase in the premiums in the coming years. On top of that attorney Christine Chinni is paid by the school board and not by the insurance company. She has been at the hearings everyday, as well as at the Board of Education meeting on Monday evening.
Beyond this, I do agree with the commenter that we need to know the facts. Andy Thibault has been doing yeoman’s work trying to help us get to the facts. You can read about his latest effort in Many Public Records Still Under Wraps Since Aug 1. Andy has been trying hard to get the facts, and the school administration has been less than forthcoming. I hope that the commenter contacts the school administration and the school board and encourages them to be more forthcoming about the facts.
The commenter also asserts that “nearly all Principals and Superintendents in the state earn the same salaries”. A brief check of the The Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents list of Connecticut Superintendent vacancies shows Canterbury is currently looking for a superintendent in the range of $108,000-$118,000. Region 16 is looking for a superintendent in the range of $130,000-$145,000. I’ve been told that Superintendent Scwartz is being paid considerably about the Region 16 range. However, I have yet been able to get details, and this is another area where Andy Thibault is trying to get information from the school administration.
I should also note that while I did live in Stamford (not Stanford, as the commenter suggests), I have moved to Woodbridge. Woodbridge is also a wealthy area that has spent a lot of money on renovations and on legal fees. My father-in-law, a retired U.S. Treasury Agent was part of a committee that investigated these costs. It is my belief, in line with the suggestion that we need to know the facts, that investigating construction costs and legal costs are an important part of the checks and balances that we need and that are too often lacking with regard to school boards.
I have no objection to the new auditorium. As I’ve spoken with taxpayers and voters in Region 10, they have all noted that the auditorium was needed. I am glad that it was built. I just hope to see that the costs are properly tracked and that it gets the sort of utilization that it deserves.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
Random Stuff
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 08/30/2007 - 10:27
Life continues to be hectic as Fiona starts school, as we try to settle into our new house, as I continue to search for a job, as I do research for blog posts on the Doninger case, as well as for other posts that I hope to write soon.
When Fiona signed the Parent/Legal Guardian Permissions 2007-2008 form, there was a section acknowledging that Fiona was aware of the rules from the BRS Handbook, which Fiona needed to sign. Because of similar such material being exhibits in the Doninger case, I thought I would scan it in for our records, and post it on Flickr. (Click on the link above).
As Fiona got on the bus, the loyal watchcat made sure everything was fine.
Also, I heard from Beth Kanter, who is in Cambodia right now for the Bloggers’ Summit. She post an entry about he First Video Cambodian Video Blogger in Cambodia. Please, check it out, and welcome Virak.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
August 29th
Faith, Love, and Cake
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 08/29/2007 - 12:46
As I’ve explored the blogosphere, I’ve met many wonderful people that I probably wouldn’t normally meet. One of them is Empress Bee. She describes herself as “conservative with liberal friends”. Well, as a liberal with conservative friends, I applaud that.
She is fighting cancer, with the sort of spirit I applaud and have come to expect from her. A friend made an image of a ribbon that sums it up nicely, “Faith, Love, and Cake”.
A couple bloggers, Mags and Asara will be participating in the "Walk for the Cure".
Please consider making your donation via Mag’s page or Asara’s page.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
Democracy is Scary
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 08/29/2007 - 08:47
Last week, I wrote about the Avery Doninger case, that Democracy is Disruptive. It is also scary. What happens if people vote for someone you don’t want in office?
This isn’t a new thought. The history of our democracy is full of people concerned that democracy is mob rule or the dictatorship of the majority. Yet our national experiment with democracy has been, by and large, a great success. With the exception of the Civil War and social unrest at various times, our democracy has functioned pretty well.
Thomas Jefferson suggested that a key to addressing the concerns about mob rule and the dictatorship of the majority is to make sure that the voters are well educated. This is ties back to why the Avery Doninger case, taking place in our public schools, is so important.
The way the school administrations handle elections is an important example to students. How much do we trust democracy, and how much are we afraid of it. Beyond the issues of freedom of speech, I believe this is where the Lewis Mills administration particularly failed.
If you don’t like the results of an election, such as Avery winning a plurality of the votes, you don’t override the results. I’ve been told that part of the principal’s justification for her actions was citing an example of hypothetical candidate that would not have been allowed to run.
The school had been suffering a spate of vandalism; students purposefully clogging the toilets. The Principal said she wouldn’t allow such a student to run. In saying that, she exhibited a lack of faith in democracy and a lack of faith in her students. If she believed in democracy, she would encourage such a candidate to run. She would make sure that the information came out in debates ahead of the vote. My guess is that the students would not vote for such a candidate. However, if such a candidate were to be elected, it would be much better for them to be spending their time as part of the student government instead of vandalizing the school.
Not only is democracy scary, but it can also be expensive and time consuming. Both sides have spent a lot on legal fees. They have spent a lot of time on this. Other families are not as fortunate to have the resources to pursue this. Other school districts are not as fortunate to have the amount of funding to pay the high salaries of their administration, pay for such spectacular renovations of their auditorium, let alone spend the money on the litigation that is being spent.
This has been a scary and expensive lesson for everyone. Let us hope that the lessons get properly built into the curriculum so that everyone can come away with a greater appreciation of the democracy that makes our country stronger.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
August 28th
Wordless Wednesday
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 08/28/2007 - 21:58
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
Quick Updates
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 08/28/2007 - 21:09
Today was Fiona’s first day of kindergarten. This was followed by another day of cleaning out the old house, so, I’ve been away from the computer all day. This was after being away all evening yesterday to attend the Region 10 Board of Education meeting. There are now over 1300 unread emails in my in box and lots of writing that I need to get done.
First and foremost, Avery is today’s hero of the day. If you haven’t checked out Beth and Rod’s A Hero A Day blog, you really should. They have lots of stories about ordinary people doing extraordinary things. For those of you who are visiting Orient Lodge as a result of Beth and Rod’s blog, you can find most of my coverage about the Avery Doninger case in the Connecticut section.
As to the Board of Ed meeting, I was hoping to put my comments up about it. Perhaps I will get to it tomorrow. Kevin Roberts of the Citizen Register reports Reg. 10 officials discuss free speech case costs. After attending the Board of Ed meeting, and then speaking with my father-in-law about investigations he did into a different Board of Ed, I think it is very important that local newspapers and bloggers do more to cover what is going on at Board of Education meetings, especially in those school districts where there is construction going on.
Andy Thibault, of Cool Justice stays on top of the information issues with FOI requests and complaints about Failure To Produce Billing & Insurance Records and Evaluations, Contracts, Paychecks, Expenses
So, that’s it for now. I need to return some phone calls, do some more writing, put up some posts, and then get to bed.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
August 27th
I’m still waiting for my invitation
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 08/27/2007 - 09:19
Back in March, David Cohn wrote a post about his Geek Thesis: Drupal and the New Left. He raises many interesting questions.
Around the same time, I wrote a blog post, The Innovation Invitation, which talked about a general sense that the 2006 Presidential campaigns are not encouraging innovation the way Gov. Dean’s Presidential campaign did.
I had a good discussion with David on the phone about these issues, and today, I received a follow up email from him. Here is the gist of my response, altered a little to fit the blog.
My post, The Innovation Invitation gets to my key view that it is not Drupal per se that mattered, but an embracing of open source, which in my mind is a simple extension of openness and transparency in government. I think that is one of the reasons Drupal has caught on less amongst conservatives than it has amongst liberals, and part of the reason I've never been concerned about whether or not they embraced Drupal. To the extent that we get anyone, independent of their political orientation, to embrace openness in government, that is a good thing.
Two books that address some of this is Mousepads, Shoe Leather, and Hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean Campaign for the Future of Internet Politics edited by Tom Streeter and Zephyr Teachout. It should be coming out any day. I have a chapter in the book describing how I got involved and touches on the ideas of the innovation invitation.
The second book is Extreme Democracy. This book was edited by Jon Lebkowsky and Mitch Radcliffe and came out in 2005. My chapter was more on the nuts and bolts of DeanSpace, but the whole book explores the idea of democracy being affected by technological ideas like extreme programming.
Recently, the Texas Forums has been having a session on the book, and we’ve discussed the lack of an innovation invitation in the 2008 election cycle.
I think it isn’t Drupal per se, that mattered in the Dean campaign, but this invitation to innovate. I think that most campaigns are very hesitant to invite innovation, and that Joe Trippi captured this hesitance best in his blog entry, The Perfect Storm
One of the other reasons I think this has not happened before is that every political campaign I have ever been in is built on a top-down military structure — there is a general at the top of the campaign — and all orders flow down — with almost no interaction. This is a disaster. This kind of structure will suffocate the storm not fuel it. Campaigns abhor chaos — and to most campaigns built on the old top-down model — that is what the net represents — chaos. And the more the campaign tries to control the “chaos” the more it stiffles its growth. As someone who is at least trying to understand the right mix — I admit its hard to get it right. But I think the important thing is to provide the tools and some of the direction — stay in as constant communication as you can with the grassroots — two way/multi-way communication — and get the hell out of the way when a big wave is building on its own.
All of this was prologue to answer David’s questions about my current involvement with the Edwards campaign and if they are using Drupal in any way.
Yes, I am supporting Edwards. In that, I add comments to blogs and on social networks when I have time indicating my support. I have suggested using Drupal to try and replicate what we did with DeanSpace, but no one was interested enough to follow up. Yet even that would simply be replicating what has been done before and not inviting people to come and innovate. I do not believe any of the campaigns are inviting people to innovate the way the Dean campaign did, so I believe that the innovators have moved on to focus on things other than presidential politics.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
August 26th
That Sickness Where You Feel Cold and Don’t Want to Talk
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 08/26/2007 - 05:17
At dinner last night, my five-year-old daughter wanted to know about that sickness where you feel cold and don’t want to talk, and I was very glad to explain it to her. I had been talking about my latest blog post on the Avery Doninger case and the “chilling effect” the actions of the school administration was having on Avery.
She is at an age where we can have interesting discussions about ideas like “freedom of speech”. We talked about how in some countries people could get punished for saying bad things about their leaders, but that that is not supposed to happen in our country. We spoke about how sometimes leaders don’t understand that and punish people for saying things that they are allowed to say and how it can make people afraid to say things that they have every right to say.
At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ (NCSL) annual meeting, David McCullough spoke about the importance of dinnertime discussion. Dr. Jack Shonkoff, Director of the Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University spoke about the importance of the early childhood years in a presentation on a A Science-Based Framework for Early Childhood Policy
The early childhood years lay the foundation for later economic productivity, responsible citizenship, and a lifetime of sound physical and mental health,”
This dinnertime discussion is part of the foundation that I hope Fiona will carry with her into her adult years as a responsible citizen.
Miranda, my fourteen-year-old daughter is off at school, so I haven’t had a good chance to speak with her about the lessons of the case, but there is a very important lesson for her as well. Miranda, like Avery, is bright, outspoken and has relished serving in student government. This summer, she attended the Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth (CTY) program and studied dissent. They read great works, like Martin Luther King's Letter from Birmingham Jail.
One of my concerns with courses of study like this, and I do not know if the CTY program fell into this problem, is that they present these great fighters for our civil rights as larger than life heroes that we cannot aspire to be. Perhaps Emerson said it best,
Meek young men grow up in libraries, believing it their duties to accept the views which Cicero, which Locke, which Bacon have given; forgetful that Cicero, Locke, and Bacon were only young men in libraries when they wrote these books.
The same applies to young women standing up for our civil rights. To use the words of a great old hymn, “for the saints of God are just folk like me, and I mean to be one too.” One of the things that is so important about Avery’s case is that she reminds all of us that the great fighters for our civil rights, were people just like you and I. I hope the story of her battle gets told to many high school kids and encourages them to stand up as well.
This takes me back to another aspect of the NCSL annual meeting. I spoke with many people there who bewailed the lack of involvement of their constituents in civic life. Is it because civics is not taught well enough in our public schools? Are people to scared to step out into civic engagement? Do people believe they are powerless? In many ways it seems as if Avery is being punished for exactly what political leaders across our country are fighting for. She got involved. She tried to get others involved and those in power didn’t like it.
In 2003, my wife and I were very involved in Gov. Dean’s Presidential bid. For us, and I believe for many, a key message was about all of us having the power change our country for the better. When he ended his bid, he encouraged his supporters to stay involved, to get more involved, to even consider running for office. My wife heeded Gov. Dean’s words and ran for State Representative. It was a great experience for both of us and I wish more people had these sorts of experiences. Like Avery, Kim is a regular person just like you or I.
So, just as I hope Fiona learned something about “that sickness where you feel cold and don’t want to talk”, I hope we all learn a little bit more about the importance of civic engagement from Avery Doninger and that we all stand a little taller and a little firmer in defense of our rights.
| 3.0( not yet rated ) |
