It’s day. My mind is full of things to write about, but I’ve just gotten home and I don’t have the time or energy to write as much as I would like.
This evening, I went to the CHC Annual Meeting of the Nursing Staff. Hopefully, I will get some time at work tomorrow to write about it.
I also started playing with a new site, or at least new to me called Mood 24/7. It is a site where people can easily, via a text message, or a form on the website, self report how they are feeling on a scale of 1 to 10. You can share it with your doctor to see if you are depressed (or perhaps bipolar or manic-depressive). You can share it with friends.
It seems like there could be some really interesting information gathered and analyzed, if they set things up right, to track how the national mood, or perhaps the mood of various states. It could be interesting to track the mood of an organization, especially as it explores organizational change.
I don’t know how open they will be with aggregate data or if it makes sense to pursue some other system that will do the same thing and provide aggregate data, but the prospects are intriguing.
I’ve had a pretty busy day, so I haven’t had a chance to check out many of the other blog posts. It looks like they managed to break 100 blogs participating in the blog party by 5:30. There is still time to join in, so, go out and read some of the other blogs about mental health, and consider adding your own. If you do, let me know.
Recently, I just stumbled across an interesting website, Typealyzer. It analyzes the text of a blog and predicts the personality type of the author. According to the site, Orient Lodge is written by someone INTP. I’ve taken various personality tests, and I normally lean towards the introverted side of things, although it isn’t a strong tendency and sometimes I even show up as extroverted.
Likewise, I tend tot sometimes show up as perceiving and other times show up as judging. In fact, on the Human Metrics MBTI style test, I showed up as INTJ.
On the other hand, the My Personality Test on Facebook, said I was ENFP a couple years ago. Unfortunately, the test didn’t work properly the other day when I tried it, so I’m not sure if things have just changed that much, or if there is something different about the test.
With that, my most strongest trait tends to be intuition instead of sensing. With that, I put the blog I write at work through the Typealyzer and came back with a personality of ISTJ.
Do I have a different personality at work than I do at home? Do I present myself that differently in my personal writing and my work writing? What about you? If you’re a blogger, what does Typealyzer say about your writing?
Today, I participated in a panel at the American Group Psychotherapy Association annual conference on what social media means for group psychotherapy. I had a good time, even thought it was a short session, and I hope people got a lot out of it.
There is a lot I could write about the day, getting up early, walking through New York, what I did afterward. Maybe when I have a little more time, I will.
However, I wanted to think for a moment about the groups I am in. Of course, for most of us the first group we belong to is our family. For some the focus might be more on the nuclear family, for others it might be more extended, but it is a group we start with. We are members of groups tied to our education. I am a member of a small group of people that went to Broad Brook school in the mid sixties. I am a member of a larger group of people that went to Mount Greylock Regional High School in the seventies. Some of these group ties are fairly weak now, others remain fairly strong.
As I think about social media, there are about 2900 different groups that I am part of in Twitter. For each person that I follow, I am a member of the group of followers of that person. Some of these groups might be small or median sized groups. Some might be large groups, or even beyond what people in Group Therapy think about as large groups. Likewise, I’m in around1900 different friends groups on Facebook. These are different than the official Facebook groups, but they have their own characteristics.
Another group that I am part of is those who have not crossed Brooklyn Ferry. I’ve walked across the Brooklyn Bridge, I’ve sailed underneath the Brooklyn Bridge, but I never took a ferry from Brooklyn to Manhattan. On the one hand, this group might seem so large that it is meaningless. A smaller group is those who have read Walt Whitman’s poem about Crossing Brooklyn Ferry.
And you that shall cross from shore to shore years hence, are more to me, and more in my meditations, than you might suppose.
Well, I have crossed from shore to shore years hence, but not on the ferry. Yet with Whitman, it is a group in my meditations.
So, what groups are you part of?
How do you see yourself? How do others see you? How would you like others to see you? There are not new questions brought in by Facebook and the Internet, however the way we approach them may be changing as a result of the Internet.
I started thinking about this when a new member joined a mailing list of Group Psychotherapists that I read. Besides the welcomes and as part of the good natured joking, the new member was asked how we knew who the new member really was. I piled on saying that we can’t really be sure about who some one is until we’ve checked their Facebook page.
There are many older members of the mailing list who are not on Facebook and responded with comments like “I guess one can’t be sure of who I am or whether I truly exist because I am not on Facebook.” The discussion waxed philosophical and folks pondered not whether a person exists, but where they exist. One person asked if people exist in the group’s mind or the mind of individuals in a group. This lead to the great sentiment about people existing in the hearts of those that love them.
All of this resonates closely to me as I glance at the book “Samuel Mendelsson: A Man Who Must Not Be Forgotten” sitting next to my computer. It is the story of a man who died during The Holocaust and was given to me by his great granddaughter, a noted therapist on the list whose friendship I have come to cherish. Samuel Mendelsson, as far as I know, does not exist on Facebook. He exists in different books and in the hearts of those that loved him.
The same applies to my Aunt Susie who passed away last week. Yesterday was her funeral and I had been asked to read my blog post reflecting on her life. I learned about her death from her grandchildren on Facebook. Susie never had a Facebook page, but she is memorialized on Facebook and in the hearts of many.
Yet it is not only in memorials that we exist in Facebook. The new member responded “You gave me great awareness and questions about how I show up to the world on face book. needless to say I thank you for the chance to take a closer look at me. FB Revisions are pending.” Another friend of mine is a young high school teacher, the kind that all the students worship and want to be friends with. I heard him speak once about how he handles Facebook friend requests from some of these students. He reads over the student’s Facebook pages very closely. If he finds inappropriate behavior, he highlights it to the student explaining that he would like being friends with the student on Facebook, but he can’t because of the inappropriate behavior. It might jeopardize both the student and his own career. Many students have cleaned up their profiles as a result of this and thought more about how they wish to be perceived by others and how they present themselves online.
The discussion brought out another new member of the list who works with adolescents who suffer from eating disorders, anxiety, depression, and body image concerns. It made me stop and wonder how these adolescents portray themselves online. How do they view themselves? How do others view them? How do they wish to be viewed? The same old questions in a new format.
It would seem as if this could lead nicely into other topics, like cyber-bullying. Another topic that it might lead nicely into are the cartoon images many Pinay mommy bloggers have of themselves online. They don’t look Philippino. One Pinay mommy blogger wrote an interesting blog post about why skin whitening lotions are so popular there. How do these Pinay mommies view themselves? How do others view them? How do they wish to be viewed? Yet another version of the same set of questions.
I don’t have any great insights to offer. Perhaps some of my friends will have that to share. Yet these seem like important questions to be thinking about.