Archive - Jan 27, 2010
#SOTU - The Trust Deficit
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 01/27/2010 - 20:53Yesterday, the FBI issued a press release concerning “22 business executives and employees were arrested and charged with attempting to win a contract to sell a variety of military and law enforcement products...by bribing overseas officials”. This was followed by a press release concerning Four Men Arrested for Entering Government Property Under False Pretenses for the Purpose of Committing a Felony. Then today, Herbert Worthy, the Mayor of the City of Ecorse, pleaded guilty today to a charge of conspiracy to commit bribery in connection with a federal investigation into corruption in the City of Ecorse.
Reports like these and many others lead to a distrust of corporations and government. Government and Corporations face a growing credibility gap, made worse by the Citizens United ruling last week by the U.S. Supreme Court. Many different ideas are being presented on how to address some of this.
Today, Rep. Rosa DeLauro issued a press release about the Prevent Foreign Influence in our Elections Act
"The Supreme Court's overreaching and irresponsible decision in Citizens United last week threatens the basic functioning of our republic in many ways, including opening the door to election-tampering by foreign corporations through their American subsidiaries. My legislation closes this potential loophole right away, using an eminently fair definition of U.S. subsidiary that even this Court must respect.
"I encourage my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to join this bill and help ensure that foreign special interests cannot take advantage of this Court-created loophole to abuse our election process. And I hope that this will be the first of many election reforms, including voluntary public financing, that we pass in the coming months to undo the damage of this egregious decision."
The bill amends the pre-existing ban on foreign nationals and foreign corporations in 2 USC 441e to include US subsidiaries of these corporations. US subsidiaries are defined as entities with over 50% foreign shareholders.
In excerpts of the State of the Union address that the White House distributed this evening, President Obama addresses these issues:
we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust – deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we must take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; and to give our people the government they deserve.
That’s what I came to Washington to do. That’s why – for the first time in history – my Administration posts our White House visitors online. And that’s why we’ve excluded lobbyists from policy-making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions.
But we cannot stop there. It’s time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my Administration or Congress. And it’s time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office. Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign companies – to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, and worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.
There is a lot of work necessary to rebuild trust in our Government and in corporations. Rep. DeLauro’s bill and President Obama’s words are just a small part of what needs to be done.
Wordless Wednesday
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 01/27/2010 - 13:23
Of, By and For the People
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 01/27/2010 - 11:59Some have compared the recent Citizens United ruling at the U.S. Supreme Court which held that corporations have the same rights of free speech to try and independently influence elections in our country as real people do, to the Dred Scott Ruling a hundred and fifty years ago. Let us hope that this comparison is valid in a few ways, but not others.
The Dred Scott ruling held that people of African descent were not protected by the Constitution. Within a few years, the United States was embroiled in a Civil War that led to the end of slavery. Let us work together to make sure that the Citizens United ruling will lead to an end of undue political influence of corporations, but hopefully, without a civil war.
The ruling has drawn close attention in Connecticut where the Citizens Election Program, a program designed to fight against undue political influence of political insiders is also in the courts.
Today, Zogby Internation released a poll showing that 79% of people polled in Connecticut support the Citizens' Election Program. In addition, “41 percent indicated they would be less likely to vote for a politician who voted against updating the popular program. “
Beyond fixing the current issues with the program and making sure that it is properly funded, State Representatives are discussing ways to limit the effect of the Citizens United ruling. State Representative Bob Godfrey has suggested that we:
apply the same requirements to corporate ads as we do to everyone else. For example: the ad must include a disclaimer by the CEO that "Paid for by XYZ Corporation. I'm CEO Smith, and the shareholders have approved of this ad." The shareholders (owners of the company) would have had to done exactly that, too.
While this won’t completely erase the negative effects of the Citizens United decision, it is a step in the right direction. Another step in the right direction is to support the Fair Elections Now Act, sponsored by Rep. John Larson of Connecticut.
Some legislators have commented about not hearing from their constituents about this issue. They compare the lack of apparent outcry to the vast concerns raised about marriage equality. This is a false comparison. Marriage equality goes to fundamental beliefs about religion and equality and is a hot button issue for many. It is an unfortunate fact, that many people take their religious obligations much more seriously than their civic obligations. Yet the underlying message stands firm. We must contact our legislators to get them to fix the Citizens Election Program and make sure it is properly funded. We must also speak with our family, friends and neighbors to help them understand the importance of defending our democracy from undue influence of the wealthy and well connected.
(Cross-posted at MyLeftNutmeg.)
Woodbridge Operating Budget Presentations
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 01/27/2010 - 10:04You can tell a lot about a town and its values as well as gain new insights about the economy as a whole by attending town operating budget presentations. In Woodbridge, these presentations are spread over three nights. The first presentations took place Tuesday evening.
Sitting around the tables were members of the Board of Selectmen and the Board of Finance. There was a small table for the people presenting the budgets and seats for maybe a dozen spectators. Three cameras were set up to record and broadcast live the meeting.
As I entered, I was greeted by various members of the community; Police Chief Marcucci, Selectwoman Beth Heller, and WGATV coordinator Pua Ford. With the exception of people preparing to present, the spectators’ seats were empty. Finance Board Chairman Matthew Giglietti started off the meeting recognizing that we are in difficult economic times and the budget needs to be trimmed.
First up was Fire Chief Andrew Esposito. Woodbridge has a new firehouse. It was designed to be a ‘green’ building. During 2011, the warrantees will be up on some of the equipment bought for the building and the ongoing support costs for these items will increase. It is not clear yet exactly how energy efficient the new building is, and the oil budget is an estimate.
Chief Esposito noted that there are currently 53 active members of the department. This is resulting in the need for more funds for training, and that the State, because of its budget cutbacks no longer funds half of the training costs for local fire departments. The issue of decreased state funding and fewer grants available was an ongoing theme of the presentations.
There was also a discussion about the need for first aid supplies, something that has been lacking since Woodbridge ceased to have a local ambulance.
The next presentation was Police Chief Gene Marcucci. The largest proposed budget increase for the police department was to get a police dog. It was explained that a police dog would be useful for finding lost children, as was an issue just this past week, or for finding lost elderly people. It was noted that there are three Alzheimer care units in Woodbridge and many senior citizens.
The third presentation was from Pua Ford of WGATV. She discussed the professional development item which would allow funds for her to attend a national conference on public access television. She spoke about the issues she would hope to learn more about from the conference. There was a discussion about how many people watch WGATV programs on TV or check the programs out of the library. While there was no clear data available, there was anecdotal evidence that the programs are well received. In fact, during the meeting, I received a text message from one person in town who had just tuned in the meeting and later when I arrived home there was an email from another person who specifically tuned in to watch the meeting. I am glad to know that others were watching online, it made the spectator chairs at the meeting feel a little less empty.
Several smaller budget items were then discussed. As technology for the town was considered, Ann Rubin asked if there were possible savings by combining technology budgets of the town and the fire department. It is worth looking into, or perhaps even having a technology oversight committee for all town technology. There was a discussion about banking costs increasing for the town and whether more checks could be written online.
The Human Services budget presentation talked about the increased needs of people in the Town of Woodbridge during these difficult economic times and again raised the issue of the decreased availability of grants. Many great programs made available by Human Services were discussed as well as efforts to work with the Recreation Department and the Town Library.
The Building Department spoke about their budget and the fees that they take in. The idea of having a different fee structure for residential and commercial buildings was discussed and will be considered at a later time, although Selectwoman Beth Heller expressed concern about whether such a move might discourage economic development. For Town Planning and Zoning, there was a discussion about revising the rules about signs. Signs are the biggest issue that TPZ faces, and the rules are not particularly clear. Almost every sign on Amity Road is an exception of one sort or another.
Another sign of the difficult economic times was the discussions of the Tax Collector and Tax Assessor. Assessments are down, but people need to remember it is still going to cost the same amount to run the town. Woodbridge Tax Collector Pat Crisco spoke about tax payments coming in. There was an involved discussion about how the town tries to work with people that are delinquent on their property taxes so as to avoid having to place a lien on the property or send a house into foreclosure.
The Parks Department ended off the meeting with a discussion about equipment that needs to be replaced. This topic had also been brought up by Human Services and the Building Department. The Parks Department had been moved to this Tuesday so that there would be more time available next Tuesday to discuss the Woodbridge Board of Education budget.
It was interesting to note that during all of the discussions, there was no reference to comparing the cost per resident of various services to that of surrounding towns. Perhaps the closest to this was a comparison of building fee structures.
The next operating budget presentation will be on Thursday and hopefully many of the residents of Woodbridge will attend or watch the presentations on WGATV.
(Cross posted at the Woodbridge Citizen.)







